LIBR 251
|
Dr.
Ziming Liu zliu@wahoo.sjsu.edu Voice: 408-924-2500 |
Course Links
Course Readings |
READINGS LISTRecommended Textbook Shneiderman, Ben (1998). Designing the user interface (3rd edition). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Information Seeking and Use Allen, B. L. (1996). Information
tasks: Toward a user-centered approach to information systems. San Diego, CA:
Academic Press. Morris, R. (1994). Toward a user-centered information service. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1): 20-30. Humans as System Users *Karat, C. M. (1998). Guaranteeing rights for the user. Communications of the ACM, 41(12): 29-31. Moggridge, B. (1999). Expressing experiences in design. Interactions, 6(4): 17-25. Neumann, L. J.; Ignacio, E. N. (1998). Trial and error as a learning strategy in system use. In: Preston, C. M. ed. ASIS’98: Proceedings of the 61st ASIS Annual Meeting (October 24-29, 1998, Pittsburgh, PA). Medford, NJ: Information Today. (p.233-252). Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance,
conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3): 38-43. Task Analysis and Description Bodker, S. (1991). Through the
interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum. Lewis, C.; Rieman, J. Task-centered
user interface design: A practical introduction. *Simonsen, J. Kensing, F. (1997). Using ethnography in contextual design. Communications of the ACM, 40(7):p 82-88. Human Factors in Design Fishkin, K. P. (2000). Embodied user interfaces for really direct manipulation. Communications of the ACM, 43(9): 75-80. *Grudin, J. (1988).Why groupware application fail: Problems in design and evaluation. Office Technology and People, 4(3): p 245-264. *Hull, J.; Hart, P. (2001).Toward zero-effort personal document management. IEEE Computer, March issue, p 2-7. *Jones, S. et al (2000).Trust requirements in e-business. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), p 81-87. *Kramer, J. et al (2000).A user-centered design approach to personalization. Communications of the ACM, 43(8): p 45-48. Volokh, E. (2000). Personalization and privacy. Communications of the ACM, 43(8): 84-88. Paper vs Electronic Documents Hsu, R. C.; Mitchell, W. E. (1997). After 400 years, print is still superior.Communications of the ACM, 40(10): 27-28. *Liu, Z.; Stork, D. (2000). Is Paperless really more? Rethinking the role of paper in the digital age. Communications of the ACM, 43(11): p 94-97. *Sellen, A.; Harper, R. (1997). Paper as an analytic resource for the design of new technologies. Proceedings of CHI’97 Conference. (p.319-326). Electronic Publishing Martin, K. (1994). Understanding the forces for and against electronic information publishing. CD-ROM Professional, 7: 129-134. *McKnight, C. (1997). Electronic journals: What do users think of them?Proceedings of international symposium on research, development and practice in digital libraries. November 18-21, 1997. Tsukaba, Japan. Odlyzko, A. M. (1995). Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals. In: Peek, Robin P.; & Newby, Gregory B. eds. Electronic publishing confronts academia: The agenda for the year 2000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Okerson, A. P. (1991). The electronic journal: what, whence, and when? Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2: 2-17. Olsen, J.(1994). Electronic journal literature: Implications for scholars. London: Mecklermedia. Sumner, T.; Shum, S. B. (1998). From documents to discourse: Shifting conceptions of scholarly publishing. Proceeding of CHI’98 conference. April 18-23, 1998. Los Angeles, CA. (p.95-102). Digital Reading Devices Adler, A. et al (1998). A diary study of worked-related reading: Design implication for digital reading devices. Proceeding of CHI’98 conference. April 18-23, 1998. Los Angeles , CA. (p.241-248). *Graham, J. (1999). The reader’s helper: A personalized document reading environment. CHI’99 Conference. http://www.crc.ricoh.com/~jamey/rhchi99pre.pdf Digital Library *Borgman, C. L. (2000).
From
Gutenberg to the global information Infrastructure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. *Levy, D. M. (1997). I read the news today, oh boy: Reading and attention in digital libraries. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international conference on digital libraries. July 23-26, 1997. Philadelphia, PA. *Marshall, C. C. (1997).Annotation: from paper books to the digital library.Proceedings of Digital Libraries'97. July 23-26, 1997. Philadelphia, PA. (p. 131-140). O'Hara, K. et al (1998). Student readers' use of library documents: Implications for library technologies. Proceeding of CHI’98 conference. April 18-23, 1998. Los Angeles, CA. (p.233-240). Usability Borgman, C. L. (1986). Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information retrieval studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(6): 387-400. Bucy, E. P. et al (1999). Formal features of cyberspace: Relationship between Web page complexity and site traffic. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 53(13): 1246-1256. Lee, A. T. (1999). Web usability: A review of the research. SIGCHI Bulletin, 31(1): 38-40. Nielsen, J. (1999). User interface directions for the web. Communications of the ACM, 42(1): 65-72. *Shneiderman, B. (1997). Designing information-abundant Web sites: issues and recommendations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(1): 5-29. Use of Information Technologies Brody, H. (1993). Great expectation: Why technology predictions go awry. High Technology Business, 10(1): 23-27. Forester, T. (1992). Megatrends or magamistakes? What ever happens to the information society. Information Society, 8: 133-146. Markus, L. M.; Keil, M. (1994). If we built it, they will come: Designing information systems that people want to use. Sloan Management Review, summer 1994, 11-25. *Note: required readings |